A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Ford slapped with a class action lawsuit for engine defects

Categories:

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ford Motor Company for allegedly selling trucks with engine defects and concealing the problems to avoid paying for the repair costs under warranty. Six consumers brought the lawsuit on behalf of all current owners of 2004-2008 Ford trucks equipped with 5.4L engines having less than 80,000 miles. Jason Schmidt et al. v. Ford Motor Co.

The Ford 5.4L engine is said to have design or manufacturing defects that cause the vehicle to accelerate, hesitate and lose power, causing sudden dangerous deceleration issues.

The plaintiffs allege that Ford knew about the defects from 2005 through 2012, and cite an August 2008 technical service bulletin to Ford dealers that addressed the problem and how to fix it. Ford, however, decided not to alert consumers. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit allege that Ford Motors intentionally omitted from telling consumers so that they would not have to cover the costs of the repairs.

The plaintiffs are seeking out-of-pocket replacement/repair costs, diminution in value of the class vehicles that is attributable to the engine defects, damages, injunctive relief and more for alleged breach of express and implied warranty, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment and violations of state consumer protection statutes.

If you have bought a defective vehicle that qualifies for California’s Lemon Law protection, please give my office, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman a call today at (877) 449-8898 for a free consultation.

Published: February 12, 2013

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

Debt Collection Harassment: Know Your Rights Under the FDCPA and California Law

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Debt collectors frequently cross legal lines in their pursuit of payment, subjecting California consumers to harassment, deception, and abuse. ...

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Robocall and Telemarketing Violations: How to Stop Unwanted Calls and Get Compensation

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Illegal robocalls and unwanted telemarketing remain among the most common consumer complaints despite federal and state laws prohibiting these ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways California’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat deceptive and unfair business practices. Understanding these protections ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a close-up of a product

Ninth Circuit Affirms Class Action Against J&J Over โ€œOil-Freeโ€ Deceptionโ€”Todd M. Friedman P.C. Leads the Fight

When a label says “oil-free,” consumers deserve to trust it. At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., we hold corporations accountable when ...