Merchants accuse credit card companies of consumer fraud

Categorized Under:

A dispute is emerging between merchants around the country and credit card companies that have implemented the new chip readers that are intended to cut down on identity fraud. The conflict is evidenced in California by a recent class action filed in federal court by three merchants against big credit card companies. The lawsuit generally raises issues of consumer fraud against defendant companies that include Visa, Mastercard, Discover, American Express and others.

The merchants claim that the card companies are using the new chips to shift the risk of liability for identity fraud back to the merchants. That means that where a case of identity fraud comes up, the defendants are refusing to compensate the victimized consumers and are telling them to complain to the merchants who processed the card transaction. This is a sea change in procedure from the most recent practice in which the card companies generally service and compensate the victims of identity fraud.

The merchants also complain that they have had to carry the financial burden of transitioning over to the new cards, including having to purchase new chip readers. They are also called upon to bear the cost of a strident certification process imposed as a prerequisite to the card companies agreeing to reassume financial liability to their cardholders. The card companies have been accelerating the pace of implementing the new system, making the timing for the class action to be particularly appropriate right now.

This federal class action filed in California, and others that may be expected to follow, could be crucial in defining the ultimate burden of financial responsibility for identity theft in this area of commerce. The merchants are claiming consumer fraud by the credit companies in that the companies allegedly knew from the beginning that the necessary certification would take years to satisfy. In that knowledge, they deceived the merchants into taking on obligations that have turned out to be financially burdensome and unjustified under the circumstances.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

credit errors vs identity theft Consumer Rights>Consumer Fraud

Credit Errors vs. Identity Theft: How to Tell Them Apart

Your credit impacts every part of your life, from where you can live to whether you can get a job. It’s a fundamental part ...
food label fraud lawyer los angeles Consumer Rights>Consumer Fraud

Is Your Food Lying To You? Lawsuits over “Misleading” Food Labels on the Rise

If there’s one thing that you’d want to be labeled correctly, it’s your food. The US has some of the most stringent food labeling ...

Consumers be wary of these two coronavirus scams

Misinformation can spread quickly and there are some businesses who go too far to get an advantage in a competitive marketplace. In an effort ...

Book a Free Case Review

We fearlessly and tenaciously represent employees and consumers in California, Illinois, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Tell us the issues you're facing, and we'll tell you what the options are.