A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

$3.6 million award for employment discrimination by retaliation

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

A wrongful termination suit in California, which is filed on behalf of an employee against the former employer, may be based on federal or state law, depending upon the facts and issues involved. In some instances, the employee may base an employment discrimination case on both state and federal statutes that have been violated. One general principle of employment law is that it is illegal for the employer to retaliate against an employee who is a legitimate whistle blower or even one who simply tries to report illegality to the employer.

Laws regarding retaliation are evolving nationwide, and it is generally true that remedies are expanding regarding the volatile issue of reporting employer illegalities. In another state recently, a jury verdict awarded $3.6 million to a therapist who complained of being fired for reporting patient neglect to her boss. The lawsuit papers indicate that the plaintiff mental health worker complained to management that the mental health facility faced issues of improper administering of medications, overdoses because of self-administration of medication, and prescription irregularities.

This award was reportedly the largest in North Carolina history from a wrongful termination case. The therapist’s attorney stated that the issue was retaliation against a mental health worker who tried to report employer wrongdoing. The plaintiff, who was terminated in Jan. 2009, claimed damages for loss of earnings and earning capacity, mental and emotional distress, medical expenses and miscellaneous losses.

The CEO of the facility stated that it will not appeal the decision. He simply indicated that despite their beliefs of acting correctly, a jury had found otherwise. The same result in an employment discrimination case with these facts is likely under California law. 

Source: citizen-times.com, “CooperRiis to pay $3.6 million in wrongful firing lawsuit“, Mar. 9, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.