A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

New Federal Rules Mean You Might Be Owed Overtime

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

The principle that a fair day’s work deserves a fair day’s pay is deeply embedded in the American work ethos. This tenet ensures that every worker’s time is valued and compensated appropriately. One of the bedrocks supporting this principle is the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which mandates that most workers who clock more than 40 hours in a week receive overtime pay. 

In a significant move to reinforce and expand this promise, the Department of Labor has introduced a new overtime regulation, potentially impacting millions of lower-paid salaried workers across the United States. At The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., we believe workers must understand these changes and how they might be entitled to additional pay.

The Importance of Overtime Protections

Overtime protections have been an integral part of the FLSA since its inception in 1938. These protections were established not only to prevent worker exploitation but also to benefit workers’ families and the broader community. By ensuring that workers are not overworked and underpaid, strong overtime protections help build and sustain America’s middle class. The recent regulatory changes are a step towards restoring these protections for a larger segment of the workforce.

Understanding the EAP Exemption

Under the FLSA, some workers are specifically exempt from its minimum wage and overtime protections. These exemptions typically apply to bona fide executive, administrative, or professional (EAP) employees. For an employee to qualify for the EAP exemption, three primary criteria must be met:

  1. The employee is paid a salary.
  2. The salary is not less than the minimum salary threshold.
  3. The employee primarily performs executive, administrative, or professional duties.

Between 1938 and 1975, the Department of Labor increased the minimum salary requirement for the EAP exemption every five to nine years. However, the infrequency of these updates since 1975 has eroded the real value of the salary threshold, diminishing its effectiveness in identifying exempt EAP employees.

The New Overtime Rule: Key Changes

The Department of Labor’s new overtime rule, developed after extensive public consultation and over 33,000 written comments, introduces significant changes to the salary thresholds that determine overtime eligibility. Here’s a breakdown of the key changes:

Increased Salary Thresholds

Starting July 1, 2024, most salaried workers earning less than $844 per week will become eligible for overtime pay. This threshold will increase again on January 1, 2025, to $1,128 per week. These adjustments mark a significant increase from the current threshold of $684 per week, expanding overtime eligibility to a larger pool of workers.

Regular Updates to Thresholds

To ensure the salary thresholds remain relevant and reflective of current wage trends, starting July 1, 2027, the thresholds will be updated every three years based on contemporary wage data. This approach provides employers with a predictable schedule for updates, allowing them to adapt more easily to changes.

Changes for Highly Compensated Employees

The rule also raises the annual compensation requirement for highly compensated employees, who are not entitled to overtime pay under the FLSA if certain conditions are met. Starting July 1, 2024, this requirement will increase from $107,432 to $132,964 per year and to $151,164 per year on January 1, 2025. These changes ensure that the compensation thresholds keep pace with overall wage growth, maintaining the integrity of the FLSA’s protections.

Impact on Workers

The new overtime rule is expected to have a significant impact on both workers and employers. For workers, especially those in lower-paid salaried positions, these changes mean greater financial security and fairer compensation for extra hours worked. 

During the development of the new rule, the Department of Labor conducted nearly 30 listening sessions across the country, hearing from a diverse range of public voices. Workers shared their experiences and concerns, emphasizing the importance of being compensated for extra work or receiving raises to reflect their workload. For many, the new rule represents a long-overdue adjustment that recognizes their hard work and dedication.

Employers will need to carefully review and potentially adjust their compensation practices to align with the new thresholds. This may involve raising salaries for certain positions to maintain the EAP exemption or adjusting workloads to minimize overtime expenses. If your employer doesn’t increase your salary or begin tracking hours, you may have grounds to file a lawsuit for unpaid wages. 

Preparing for the Changes

With the new rule already in effect as of July 1, 2024, it is crucial for workers like you to take action if you fall below the current or upcoming non-exempt threshold. Here are some steps to consider:

  1. Review Your Compensation: If you are a salaried worker earning close to or below the new thresholds, review your compensation and job duties. Determine if the new rule will make you eligible for overtime pay.
  2. Document Your Hours: Keep a detailed record of your working hours, especially if you often work more than 40 hours a week. This documentation can be crucial in ensuring you receive the correct overtime compensation.
  3. Discuss with Your Employer: If you believe you will be impacted by the new rule, have a conversation with your employer about how your compensation might change and what steps they plan to take to comply with the latest regulations.

Make Sure You’re Paid the Overtime You’re Owed

The Department of Labor’s new overtime rule represents a significant step forward in protecting American workers and ensuring they receive fair compensation for their time and effort. By increasing the salary thresholds for overtime eligibility and providing regular updates, the rule aims to restore the promise of the FLSA and extend its benefits to millions of lower-paid salaried workers.At The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., we are dedicated to advocating for workers’ rights and ensuring that every worker receives the pay they deserve. If you have questions about the new overtime rule or believe you may be entitled to additional pay, we encourage you to contact us for a consultation. Our experienced team is here to help you navigate these changes and secure the compensation you are owed.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.