A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

What is considered debt collector harassment?

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is the federal law that governs how debt collection agencies can operate. The FDCPA protects consumers from abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors.  The Act gives consumers protection with regards to personal, family, and household debts, including money consumers owe on a personal credit card account, auto loan, medical bill, or mortgage. There has been a lot of litigation over what exactly is considered “harassment” or “abuse” under the FDCPA.  Below are examples of tactics that are definitely considered harassment and abuse by the FDCPA:
?Debt collectors cannot use threats of violence to collect a debt.  This prohibition also covers threats against your children, friends, co-workers, pets and other 3rd parties.
?Bill collectors cannot use profane or abusive language including name calling, racial and/or ethnic slurs.
?Collectors cannot  call you repeatedly. This not only applies to actual phone conversations, but also to causing the phone to ring and then hanging up on you. Oddly, enough many of my clients have complained that debt collectors call and hang-up as a method of harassment.
?Debt collectors must tell you who is contacting you.
?Any other debt collection conduct where the “natural consequence” is to harass, oppress, or abuse.  Courts have found the following conduct to be violations: (1) threats to contact 3rd parties; (2) telephone messages left with neighbors when the collector could have reached the consumer directly; (3) use of words like “liar”, “deadbeat”, and “crook”.

If you are being harassed by debt collectors, document all of the debt collectors’ communications. And if the debt collector does anything untrue, harassing, oppressive, or abusive, please California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.  If I agree to handle your FDCPA case, you won’t have to pay me any money up front.  The debt collector found to be in violation must pay my attorney fees.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.