A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Phone companies need to take responsibility for screening out robocallers.

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Almost everyone with a phone has experienced this: automatic phone solicitations that are not only uninvited and unwanted, but specifically requested to be stopped. It can seem like nothing can be done to stop these calls. Although legally, this type of marketing should cease when a recipient request it, the reality is that many of these calls will continue long after you have requested for them to stop.

The question arises: who is responsible for this? Whose job is it to make sure these companies and marketing firms stop calling people who request to be taken off their lists?

The Phone Companies Should Be Responsible

According to attorney Todd M. Friedman, as reported in NBC Los Angeles online, it is the phone service providers.

Friedman has a wealth of experience in this area, having handled hundreds of robocall lawsuits in his career. According to Friedman, “There’s just been a spike of these robocalls… If they have the capability then they should do it because this is obviously a huge problem.”

What to Do if You Are Harassed by Robocallers

If you are in a situation where you keep getting these automated calls from the same source, you have a few options:

  • Tell them to take you off the list: Legally, companies are not permitted to continue calling you for marketing purposes if you have asked them to take you off their call list. This is a good first step but is rarely effective in itself.
  • Call the phone company: Continual pressure on the phone companies could motivate them to begin taking more effective action to stop these calls for their customers.
  • Call the FCC: Reporting violations from advertisers can create distinct legal problems for them and thwart their efforts to keep calling you.
  • Talk with an attorney: Working with a lawyer who has experience handling phone advertisement violations is the best thing you can do to protect your rights and get the calls to stop.

Although robocalls are a significant problem for many people right now, persistent and strategic action can hopefully reduce or even eliminate this type of nuisance eventually.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.