A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Truck drivers win big against Wal-Mart for unpaid wages

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

When an employee works, that employee should get paid. It is a simple rule for employment law, but one that major employers seem to forget far too often.

In the trucking industry, it is particularly easy for employers to fudge the lines regarding when their drivers are officially working and when they are not. The primary job of truck drivers, of course, is to drive, but truckers have many other duties that do not directly involve driving, and that is where many employers try to find excuses to not pay their drivers.

Wal-Mart Loses

According to Associated Press online, a group of hundreds of truck drivers recently won more than $54 million in a lawsuit against Wal-Mart. The claim was that Wal-Mart did not pay them for the time they spent inspecting their trucks, cleaning their trucks, and layovers when they had to stay with their trucks.

Attorneys for the truck drivers claim that the total amount owed by Wal-Mart could reach to $150 million or more when additional damages and penalties are included in the final award.

This is a significant victory for employees seeking just wages for their work.

Further Legal Action

Of course, the case is not over, as the attorneys for Wal-Mart said they are likely to file motions and perhaps appeal some of the jury’s conclusions. They claim they pay their drivers above and beyond what California law requires, and their drivers are among the highest paid in the industry.

A Clear Message Sent

Even if Wal-Mart appeals, the plaintiffs victory sends a clear message that employees deserve to be paid for all the work they do. When major corporations like Wal-Mart fail to pay their employees, the law will step and make sure justice is obtained.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.