A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Class actions claim consumer fraud against 2 dog food makers

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

In California and other states, deceptive labeling of food products often is a basis for a consumer class action claim of fraud. The same is true of pet foods that contain deceptive labeling. A dog owner in another state recently filed two separate but virtually identical class action lawsuits claiming consumer fraud violations against Nestle and Wellpet, two major national dog food manufacturers and marketers.

The complaints allege that the dry dog food for both companies is labeled as “made in the USA,” but that those claims are deceptive and violative of state consumer fraud laws, including the laws of California and seven other states. The plaintiff accuses the defendants of mixing ingredients into the food that come from foreign countries. She alleges that, based on guidelines of the Federal Trade Commission, the labels stating made in the USA are deceptive.

She also alleges that the vitamin C in each product, along with vitamin and amino acid packs, are not American-made products. She asked the court in Illinois to include in the class residents of California and the seven other states where consumer protection laws have been violated. The complaint stresses the importance of all ingredients coming from the United States because, in recent years, there has been a plethora of pet food recalls based on adulterated or illicitly mixed chemicals and substances that are sourced from other countries.

The complaint states the class members are putting their dogs’ health at risk and are not getting their money’s worth in paying for food made in the United States that is loaded with products made in foreign countries. Some of the contaminants in recent recalls of dog and cat foods included salmonella, listeria, amantadine, toxic vitamin D and other poisonous substances. The complaint contains a count that lists violations by the defendants of the consumer fraud laws of California, and those of the seven other states. The complaint also alleges a violation of the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Source: cookcountyrecord.com, “Class actions say Purina, Wellpet brand ‘made in USA’ dog foods actually aren’t“, Scott Holland, Feb. 2, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.