A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

A Manager May Still Be Entitled To Overtime Pay

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

If your employer has give you the title of  “Manager,” but you spend almost no time managing people, you may be eligible for overtime pay.

As a cost-cutting measure, many employers use job titles, such as “Manager” for their lower level employees to avoid paying them overtime.   This being said, employees in these job titles who do not regularly supervise 2 or more full-time employees may be eligible for overtime pay.

In determining whether an employee is primarily engaged in exempt work, the California’s Labor Commissioner examines the work performed by the employee during the workweek.

Salary Consideration:

Exempt employees in California generally must earn a minimum monthly salary of no less than two times the state minimum wage for full-time employment (California’s current minimum wage is $8.00 per hour). Simply paying an employee a salary does not make them exempt, nor does it change any requirements for compliance with wage and hour laws.

Duties and Responsibilities

Executive: To qualify for the “executive”  exemption, employees must manage the operations of a business, department, or subdivision within the company. They must direct and supervise the work of at least 2 employees and have the authority to hire, fire, and promote. Typically, employees meeting these conditions include your Vice- Presidents, Directors, and Chief Executive Officers.

Administrative: To qualify for the “administrative” exemption, employees must exercise independent judgment performing non-manual work that is directly related to business operations. Typically, employees falling under the administrative exemption category include office managers, insurance agents, human resource professionals, and marketing personnel.

Professional: Employees who qualify for the “professional” exemption must have advanced knowledge in a field of science or learning through prolonged course of instruction (i.e. university, college, law or medical school). Occupations that require prolonged study include doctors, lawyers, dentists, professors, accountants, and the like.

Outside Sales:  To successfully qualify for the “outside sales” exemption the employee’s primary duties should involve making sales away from their employer’s physical place of business.  Inside sales would not qualify.

If your employer has incorrectly classified you and owes you overtime pay, please call California Employment Attorney, Todd M. Friedman for a free consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.