A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

This is Debbie from Cardholder Services. Sound familiar?

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Ugh!  You pick up the phone, hear a silence, then a click, followed by a friendly sounding voice introducing themselves, sometimes its Debbie sometime a different name.  Are you sick of getting telemarketing robo-dial phone calls that sound like that?  According to the Federal Trade commission , they are most likely illegal in addition to being annoying.

Debbie is most likely not her real name and she is probably not even affiliated with your credit card company.  This “Debbie”  person is not really interested in lowering your interest rate.  No! She is trying to trick you into giving her your credit card information so she and other scammers (that she sells your info to) can bill you thousands of dollars, for deceptively advertised “services” that don’t stand much of a chance of reducing your rates.  In some cases, the FTC reports that consumers have even been charged when they decline.

Thankfully, that the Federal Trade Commission has filed several lawsuits against a dozens of companies the agency says are behind these deceptive tactics.

If you are getting unsolicited robo-dial telemarketing calls to your cell phone, the company may be in violation of the Telephone Consumer  Protection Act (TCPA) and you may be entitled to compensation.  Please give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call today at (877) 449-8898 to discuss your case today.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.