A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Check out these crazy Halloween laws on the books…

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

The town of North Riverside, Ill., has dubbed Oct. 31, “Halloween Party Time,” but only for children and only before 7 p.m.

In South Hill, Va., if you are over age 12, masks, costumes or disguises are forbidden, even in a private home.

Sanford North Carolina prohibits anyone over the age of 12 from appearing in public “for the purpose of making ‘trick or treat’ visitations” and limit trick-or-treating to 6 to 9 p.m. on Halloween night.

Of course, some of the most noteworthy Halloween laws don’t deal with child safety at all. As reported on the website Smosh.com, there are Halloween laws that require you to get a permit from the sheriff to wear a mask in public, laws that prohibit “pretending to be a clergyman” and even laws that impose a $1,000 fine for spraying silly string.

In 2010, Livingston Parish in Louisiana mandated that trick-or-treating occur on Monday, Nov. 1, out of concern that some residents that might be offended by costumed children celebrating Halloween on a Sunday.

Most towns ban any activity in cemeteries after sundown, but one of our favorite cemetery laws comes from Gastonia. Under the local code, all funerals “must be arranged so that the grave may be properly filled and all surplus ground cleaned away before 6 p.m.” You may wonder what this law has to do with Halloween. Although there may be valid safety concerns with leaving unfilled holes in the ground at night, we note that Gastonia has never had a problem with vampires. Denying vampires an open and inviting place to rest before sunrise must have something to do with that.

We hope you have a safe, fun and lawful Halloween and we invite you to contact us regarding your legal issues at (877) 449-8898.

 

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.