A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Los Angeles Sexual Harassment Attorneys

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Take Back Your Power With A Sexual Harassment Lawyer Serving Clients Nationwide

Unless you’re a sex worker, your job security should not hinge on sexual favors. If someone above you in the workplace hierarchy makes it clear either explicitly or implicitly that your job may be on the line unless you consent to sexual contact, this is known as quid pro quo sexual harassment. Not surprisingly, it is against the law. Even a relationship that appears to be consensual between a boss and a subordinate is problematic. That’s because true consent is not possible when one person has the power to fire the other. Sexual harassment in the workplace can take many forms, however, and can range from enduring unwanted sexual advances to facing the brick wall of sexual discrimination to even being raped at work. It’s not right, and it doesn’t have to be this way.

When you schedule your free initial consultation with the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, Mr. Friedman will listen to your story without judgment and assess your options based on the available evidence. Don’t endure one more day of control and manipulation. Call us today at to make an appointment.

Challenging A Cascade Of Workplace Offenses

Sexual harassment is not often a lone wolf of a problem in the workplace. People who are harassed, and especially those who file lawsuits and then return to work, often face a series of interlocking employment law issues, including retaliation and wrongful termination. Ongoing sexual harassment can also lead to poor job performance and chronic depression. For that reason, it may be better for some victims of sexual harassment to find another job first and then file a sexual harassment lawsuit from the safety of a new workplace. That approach, however, may not be realistic for some people. Whatever your particular situation, you don’t need to stand for this disrespectful and damaging treatment. Contact California attorney Todd M. Friedman and assert your right to a safe work environment.

Empower Yourself With Information. Call Today.

Seeing a lawyer does not mean you have to file a lawsuit. But with the advice of an experienced employment law attorney, you can gain perspective about where you stand and what your next best move might be.

At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., you will speak with your attorney directlyTodd Friedman’s in-depth case analysis and timely feedback are a tremendous benefit to clients contemplating harassment cases.

Call our offices at to schedule an appointment with Todd M. Friedman or email us.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.