A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Robocall and Telemarketing Violations: How to Stop Unwanted Calls and Get Compensation

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Key Takeaways

  • TCPA prohibits autodialed calls and texts to cell phones without prior express consent
  • Each violation can result in $500-$1,500 in statutory damages per call or text
  • National Do Not Call Registry violations trigger separate penalties
  • California’s automatic renewal law adds state-level protections
  • Document unwanted calls with screenshots, call logs, and recordings where legal

Illegal robocalls and unwanted telemarketing remain among the most common consumer complaints despite federal and state laws prohibiting these practices. Understanding your rights enables consumers to stop unwanted calls and recover compensation for violations. The consumer protection attorneys at Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. are leading experts in TCPA litigation, having recovered substantial damages for victims of illegal robocalls.

Understanding the TCPA and California Consumer Protection Laws

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibits making calls using automatic telephone dialing systems or prerecorded messages to cell phones without prior express consent. California adds additional protections through its automatic renewal law and unfair competition statutes.

Types of Illegal Robocalls and Text Messages

TCPA violations include autodialed marketing calls to cell phones without consent, prerecorded telemarketing messages, autodialed text messages, and continued calls after requesting to be placed on a do-not-call list.

Even calls from companies you previously did business with may violate the TCPA if you revoked consent or if the calls use autodialing equipment without proper consent.

Do Not Call Registry Violations

The National Do Not Call Registry prohibits telemarketing calls to registered numbers unless the consumer has an established business relationship with the caller. Violations occur when telemarketers ignore do-not-call requests or call registered numbers without permission.

Damages Available for TCPA Violations

Each TCPA violation entitles consumers to $500 in statutory damages, increasing to $1,500 per violation for willful or knowing violations. Consumers receiving numerous illegal calls can accumulate substantial damages.

How to Document Robocall Violations

Save voicemails from robocallers and take screenshots of text messages showing phone numbers and timestamps. Maintain detailed call logs recording dates, times, and caller ID information. In California, you can record calls without the other party’s consent to document violations.

Class Actions vs. Individual TCPA Claims

TCPA claims can proceed as individual actions or class actions depending on the scope of violations. Class actions aggregate claims from multiple affected consumers while individual actions may provide faster resolution and full statutory damages.

Conclusion: Stop Illegal Robocalls and Get Paid

If you’re being bombarded with illegal robocalls and unwanted text messages, you don’t have to suffer in silence. The TCPA gives you the right to fight back and recover substantial compensation—up to $1,500 per illegal call or text. These damages can add up quickly, especially when companies engage in systematic calling campaigns.

Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is nationally recognized for our TCPA litigation practice. We’ve successfully prosecuted hundreds of cases against robocallers, telemarketers, and companies that violate consumer privacy rights. Our attorneys know how to document violations, build compelling cases, and maximize recoveries for our clients. If you’re receiving illegal robocalls or texts, contact us today for a free consultation. We’ll evaluate your case and help you stop the calls while recovering the compensation you deserve.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.