A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

18 Los Angeles garment makers fined for labor law violations

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
After a sweep on September 7 and 8, California Labor Commissioner’s Office investigators have fined 18 Los Angeles garment contractors and manufacturers a total of $682,344 for labor law violations. Hefty fines for violations Six employers were fined $603,043 and given stop orders because they weren’t providing workers’ compensation insurance. An additional $42,300 in fines was given out to 14 businesses that violated garment registration rules, and investigators confiscated 85 bags of garments which were illegally manufactured. Those pieces of clothing will be donated to homeless and domestic violence shelters in the area. The sweep operation went through 22 different work sites. Of the 18 manufacturers that were fined, they employed 296 workers total. The Commissioner’s office will continue to pursue those employers and investigate their failures to pay appropriate wages under California labor codes. Sweatshops “threaten workers’ rights” Labor Commissioner Julie A. Su commented that when sweatshops threaten workers’ rights, undermines the legitimate garment businesses and makes it difficult to stay in operation. She added the Labor Commissioner’s Office will do everything they can to hold those businesses who work with unregistered contractors accountable. Even though state and federal laws are very clear, some companies and businesses still continue to try to violate their workers’ rights. If you’ve been subjected to underpayment, overtime wage refusal, denial of benefits or breaks, now is a good time to learn your rights. Contact the Department of Industrial Relations and the Labor Commissioner’s Office to report any violations you know about – you can do it easily online at their websites. You should also talk to your lawyer right away to determine if your employer has violated labor laws and if you can potentially obtain compensation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.