A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

A grocery store customer is awarded over $1 million for personal injuries sustained in slip and fall accident

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Amy Jong, a 99 Ranch Market shopper has been awarded $1,077,063 in her personal injury lawsuit against the grocery store.

According to court documents, Jong slipped and fell while shopping at 99 Ranch Market in Dublin, California on an unidentified liquid near a refrigeration unit. As a result of the fall Jong had to undergo reconstructive surgery the next day. However she later developed necrosis which led to her needing a full hip replacement. Necrosis is death of body tissue. It occurs when there is not enough blood flowing to the tissue, whether from injury, radiation, or chemicals. Necrosis is not reversible.

In her lawsuit, Jong blamed Welcome Market Inc., the parent company of the 99 Ranch Market, alleging it failed to adequately inspect the premises. She further contended that the floor was excessively slippery.

In cases like the above, the courts take in to consideration the following when determining whether the property owner or business is legally responsible for the injuries someone suffered from slipping on their property:

• Did the owner of the premises or an employee cause the spill or slippery surface?
• Did the owner of the premises or an employee know of the dangerous surface but done nothing about it.
•The owner of the premises or an employee should have known of the dangerous surface because a “reasonable” person taking care of the property would have discovered and fixed-it.

In determining a property owner’s “reasonableness,” the court concentrates on whether the owner makes regular and thorough efforts to keep the property safe and clean:

•If a person slips on a wet, had the dangerous spot been there long enough that the owner or employees should have known about it?
•Does the property owner have a regular procedure for examining and cleaning the premises? If so, what proof does the owner have of this regular maintenance?
•Could a barrier or warning sign have been put in place to prevent people from slipping?

If you have suffered a personal injury due to the negligence of another person or entity, please give California Personal Injury Attorney Todd M. Friedman a call at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.