A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Agencies and restaurants accused of employment discrimination

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

It may not be widely known that many immigrants in California and other states are being shoveled into jobs where they do the unsavory work that Americans often will not do. For the privilege, the man or woman receive an hourly wage rate that is far less than minimum wage. Many of them may find that they have a claim for employment discrimination against the employer for treating them differently than similarly situated Caucasians.  

In another state, authorities found that kind of widespread discrimination and sued three employment agencies for discriminatory treatment of immigrant Latino workers. The state authorities claimed that the agencies profited by taking “desperately poor” Latinos and placing them in restaurant jobs that paid them as little as $3.50 per hour. They were required to work 14-hour days and were housed in overcrowded, unhealthy and filthy conditions.

The federal lawsuit filed in Chicago claims that the agencies attracted homeless Mexicans who moved from city to city looking for work. They agencies charged the workers $10 dollars a night to sleep on the floor while waiting for work. They also allegedly assessed other  job referral charges and fees that made the workers hopelessly  indebted to the agencies, according to the lawsuit.

The suit also charges two buffet restaurants with abusing desperate, poverty-stricken workers, harassing them and creating a hostile work environment. The restaurants made the workers live in overcrowded and squalid housing conditions. The lawsuit, filed by the state attorney general, alleged that all defendants were guilty of racial  and national origin employment discrimination and labor law violations. The suit seeks injunctive relief, lost wages, penalties and punitive damages on behalf of the abused workers. The same types of remedies are available in California through state and federal employment discrimination actions.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.