A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Almost two-thirds of scientists say they were sexually harassed

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
Sexual harassment is a degrading and embarrassing action that leaves the victim feeling uncomfortable at work. One of the most upsetting elements of some sexual harassment incidents is that the offender is a supervisor. They may use their workplace clout to try to curry sexual favors from an individual who works for them, and they may even say that their job depends on it, or that if they perform the sexual act they will get a promotion. These are truly nefarious actions and the offending employee deserves to be held accountable for his or her behavior. However, sometimes the sexual harassment won’t be as blatant as we outlined above. It can be as “minor” as a tasteless email or an inappropriate comment. These things can still affect other employees, and it can lead to a disrupted and uncomfortable work atmosphere. With this in mind, consider the many fields of science out there. These are very intelligent people who are working hard to learn and discover new things. And yet, they appear to be just as prone to sexually harassing behavior as anyone else. A new study found that roughly 64 percent of the respondents to a sexual harassment survey — specifically handed out to scientists in numerous fields — said they had been sexually harassed before, and a staggering 20 percent said they had been sexually assaulted at work. These are scary and unacceptable figures. No one should have to fear going into work, regardless of whether they are working in the sciences or at a fast food restaurant. We all have a right to a safe and pleasant working environment. Source: Washington Post, “Study: Young female scientists face sexual harassment, assault while in the field,” Caelainn Hogan, July 17, 2014

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.