A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

American Apparel creates new sexual harassment policy

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
Now that clothing company American Apparel has fired Dov Charney, its founder and CEO, after numerous accusations of sexual harassment, the company is changing its policy regarding treatment of employees. The company announced earlier this month that it has developed a new anti-sexual harassment policy. The new policy makes it clear that American Apparel will not tolerate “discriminatory slurs, or any other remarks, jokes or conduct” of a sexual nature deemed by management to be harassment or otherwise create a hostile work environment. In a statement announcing the policy, American Apparel also said that managers are no longer allowed to have sexual relationships with their subordinates. The new policy came about a month after Charney was ousted from the company following an internal investigation into several charges that he behaved inappropriately with his employees. He was the subject of multiple sexual harassment suits. Following a long suspension from his job, Charney was fired in December. At the time, American Apparel’s investigation concluded that “it would not be appropriate for Mr. Charney to be reinstate as CEO” or have any other role in the Los Angeles-based company. When a business is run by a person who sexually harasses employees, it is difficult to see how anyone could be protected from this conduct. Perhaps clearing house and changing its policies will make American Apparel a safe place to work out. Meanwhile, when an employee who has been sexually harassed goes through the chain of command at work, only to have their report ignored or lead to retaliation, he or she may be able to sue for compensation. This can make the victim whole for what happened to him or her, and send the business the message that sexual harassment is not acceptable in California.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.