A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Are Hotel Fees Eating Away At Your Travel Fun?

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
Have you booked a hotel room at a great price only to find out upon check-out that there was an extra $50 “resort fee”?   Suddenly that great price is not so great after-all.  This  situation happens to many unsuspecting travelers everyday.  Sometimes the extra fees can be for the gym or the internet.  But, what if you don’t use the gym or the internet?  It does not seem fair for you to have to pay extra for  amenities that you do not use and that were not disclosed to you in the original price that you thought you were paying. There was a very well known Las Vegas hotel, that has since been torn down,  that had an extra $2.00/person charge for electricity.  Two dollars per person does not seem like much, but in my opinion the cost of electricity should have been included in the cost of the room, not an add-on fee at the time of check-in. According to a recent Los Angeles times article, Consumer Advocate Ed Perkins, who, with Charlie Leocha, Executive Director of the Consumer Travel Alliance, and Kevin Mitchell, Chairman of the Business Travel Coalition, sent the Federal Trade Commission, (FTC) a letter of complaint, stating that this practice  “Is an inherently deceptive process. https://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/23/travel/la-tr-spot-20120923 As a consumer protection attorney I am looking into the legality of this “extra fee”  practice and will be sure to keep you posted regarding my progress.    If you are a consumer that has been the victim of fraud or deceptive practices please contact my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman at (877) 449-8898.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.