A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

AT&T has reached a settlement in an employment lawsuit regarding overtime pay

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

AT&T, a leader in telecommunication services, including home phones, cell phones and hi-speed internet has reached a settlement with Cathy Birdsong, a former AT&T employee, accusing the company of  failing to pay overtime or provide meal and rest breaks.

According to the complaint,  AT&T misclassified Birdsong and other California business manager employees as “exempt” as a tactic to deny them overtime compensation and other benefits. Birdsong said most of her job duties consisted of work that did not qualify as exempt status.

The Fair Labor and Standards Act (FLSA) states that  only “exempt” employees are exempt from being paid overtime.  The FLSA has some exemptions that justify an employee’s job being classified as exempt and they are:

1. The Executive Exemption
These employees have the authority to hire and fire other employees, as well as affect promotional decisions. They must manage at least two full-time direct reports or their equivalent.
2. The Administrative Exemption
These employees must be trusted to exercise independent judgment and discretion in “matters of significance” performing office or non-manual work. These employees should be creating and influencing policies, not just following them.
3. The Professional Exemption
This exemption actually has two parts to it. The first is the Learned Professional. This requires knowledge in a field of learning or science that is acquired by prolonged instruction. Work is intellectual in nature and requires exercise of discretion and judgment.   An academic degree or credential is usually required as proof of this advanced learning; providing evidence that the employee satisfies “specialized intellectual instruction.” Examples of these types of jobs include: doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers, and architects.
The second professional exemption is the creative professional. These people engage in work that requires invention, imagination, originality, or talent. Examples of these jobs include those in the field of music, writing, acting, and graphic arts.
4. The  Compensation Exemption
The minimum salary requirement in California is 2 times the minimum wage hourly rate of pay, or 2 x $8 = $16  (California’s minimum wage is $8/hour) and the employee must perform one of the duties of an exempt executive, administrative, or profession employee.
5. The Outside Sales Exemption
These sales people must spend the majority of their time out of the office soliciting sales, customer orders, and contracts.

If you have been classified incorrectly and your employer owes you overtime pay, please give California Employment Attorney, Todd M. Friedman a call for a free consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.