A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Back Pay and Overtime Wages For Underpaid Chevron Subsidiary Employees

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
For several years, the U.S Department of Labor’s Wage and Hours Division has conducted investigations into underpayment of workers in the field of oil and gas. Central to the investigations was the pre-shift relief meetings. These pre-shift meetings are mandatory for employees and involve an information exchange between the previous shifts employee and the employee coming onto the next. The investigation found that these meetings, which often last 15 minutes or longer, were not being recorded on the hourly workers’ time cards. This unaccounted time constitutes as unpaid overtime the employee is being required to perform. The investigation resulted in a judgement against Chevron product companies and its subsidies in the amount of $1.5 million in back overtime wages to be paid to approximately 750 employees. The investigation also found that company had performed bookkeeping violations by failing to report the additional time for these meetings. The Wage and Hours Division says that it will continue to investigate the oil and gas industries for irregularities in wages to ensure wage compliance. The department feels that the oil and gas industry employees can often be shorted based on the business models followed by many of the major energy companies. This post will discuss some of your rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which was created to ensure fair pay for all workers. Number of Hours Worked The FLSA defines the numbers of hours worked as the amount of time you are required to be on company premises or at a specific job site related to your work responsibilities or company demands. It is important to remember that if you are required to participate in meetings or training, before or after your scheduled shift, these hours should be recorded on your time card. An employer should not ask you to perform your duties before or after you have punched out. Overtime Pay Rates If you are an hourly paid employee and work beyond the standard 40 hour work week, your company is required to compensate you at a minimum of one and a half times your normal hourly pay rate. You will want to remember that if you are required to be at work, even if it is for time outside of your regular duties, anything exceeding 40 hours should be paid at your company’s posted overtime wage. Company Record Keeping Part of this regulation requires your employer to post labor laws, which detail minimum wage, overtime, and other employee rights information in a place visible to all employees. Additionally your company is required to maintain an accurate record of all employee hours worked at both regular and overtime rates. You should be able to request reports from your payroll or human resources department in the event of a suspected discrepancy. Even if you average the same pay each week, it is important to monitor your pay stubs to determine any hour discrepancies as soon as they are noticed. As an employee, you have a right to be paid a fair wage for all hours that you have worked for the company. This includes any meeting and planning time that may be required before or after your scheduled shift. Knowing your rights and enforcing your concerns can help to prevent the type of widespread underpayment that has been exposed in the case of the Chevron company subsidiaries. Fair pay for a hard day’s work.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.