A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Can one co-worker make more than another for doing the same job?

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

The general principle of equal pay for equal work is embedded in our culture. Most of us feel like people with the same work responsibilities, hours, job requirements and the like should receive the same compensation.

But what happens when compensation packages differ significantly between two people with the same qualifications doing the same job? When two colleagues have significantly different compensation packages, can one of them sue the employer?

Complicated Questions

There are no easy answers to those questions. A recent article by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) discusses disparate pay for the same work performed by different people.

According to the article, different pay is not necessarily illegal. There are numerous reasons why different pay is acceptable. One employee could have more experience or more pertinent certification. Even seniority in a specific company does not necessarily mean the employee with seniority should get more pay, especially if the other employee has substantial experience with another company in a similar position.

Protecting Your Rights as an Employer

Although employers have significant latitude when it comes to disparate pay, employees still have rights. Employees in the situation where a colleague is making more for the same work often consider the possibility of talking with an attorney about a possible legal claim. Members of protected classes (based on religious affiliation, age, gender, sexual orientation and other categories), you seek a discrimination claim.

Although employers are not guaranteed exactly equal pay and there are many reasons why employers could offer different compensation packages, employers still need to be careful about compliance issues (which can vary by jurisdiction) and potential exposure to legal action.

As an employer, it is critical to work with an experienced employment lawyer to protect your business’s interests and stay clear of potential problems in this area.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.