A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Can you be charged a foreign transaction fee from your couch?

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Retail for two decades has been trending online from brick-and-mortar storefronts. The high-speed internet surge and smartphone revolution caters to a digital bazaar that lets consumers globe trot for goods without leaving their couch. Moreover, the pandemic has driven people indoors and forced them to shop even more on the internet.

Credit cards are the lifeblood of this marketplace. Banks managing the transactions can charge fees in addition to interest rates. Some are familiar. A provider can assess a foreign transaction or exchange fee that typically is 1-3% of your purchase when travelling abroad.

But what if you are sitting at home and buy spices from a website in India or a beer stein off one in Germany? Can banks charge a foreign transaction fee for that? The answer may be in the fine print of your credit-card contract.

Mistake or misconduct?

In general, banks charge consumers for converting American dollars into a foreign currency when they physically are in another country. Some banks waive these foreign transaction or exchange fees in neighboring Canada and Mexico. But applying them to ecommerce may violate terms of your agreement.

The federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau requires providers disclose these fees in the card contract. They may be itemized as a transaction fee and a currency conversion fee that add up to 3%. But it might take months for these to show up on your credit-card statement, and they could just slide under the radar.

Is your bank counting on that indifference to pluck a few more dollars out of your pocket? Or was it a simple administrative error?

Knowing your rights

Consumers may be entitled to reimbursement or additional compensation for damages. Investigators who find that banks improperly charged their customers or inflated their fees may lay the groundwork for a claim. Everything depends on the credit-card contract and circumstances surrounding alleged foreign transactions.

Customers have rights to protect but may not have the knowledge or wherewithal to fight a powerful financial institution. Speaking with an attorney experienced in consumer protection laws could determine whether you were improperly charged for something you should not have been.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.