A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Chicago Strikes a Blow Against LGBT Workplace Discrimination

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Under the Civil Rights movement, there are numerous protected groups. Many people of different faiths, ages and belief systems have come under the protection of the Civil Rights Act.

However, one group that has not been afforded the legal protection of the Civil Rights Act is the LGBT community – until now.

Federal Appellate Court in Chicago Affirms LGBT Workplace Protections Under the Civil Rights Act

According to a recent report in the Chicago Tribute, the First U.S. Appellate Court in Chicago just ruled to extend Civil Rights Act protection for a woman fired from her job unjustly because she is a lesbian. According to the article, “Eight judges on the Chicago appellate court agreed that workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Three judges wrote dissenting opinions.”

This is a decision long in the making, as LGBT employees have not been able to obtain these protections under the Act. Just a few weeks ago, in fact, a three-judge panel in Atlanta ruled that employers are legally permitted to discriminate against employees based on sexual orientation.

There is an obvious problem here in the legal schema: Since not that long ago the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of giving legal recognition to homosexual marriages, it does not make sense that the same group would not be afforded the protections of the Civil Rights Act in the workplace.

This recent Chicago court decision represents the beginning of change in this legal disconnect.

The Impact of This Decision

Although this one decision simply returns the case back to its starting point in Indiana, and ultimately carries direct precedent only in Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana, the long-term implications are likely going to be widespread.

Lower courts of other districts can use this precedent as compelling, and other courts will likely use this case to continue extending Civil Rights Acts protections to people of all sexual orientations.

What Does This Mean For You?

If you have been discriminated against in your workplace for your sexual orientation, you could have a strong claim where you might not have mere weeks ago. In the 7th Circuit, of course, you have direct legal precedent on your side. In other areas, you have a much more compelling claim. Talk with an experienced attorney to protect your rights in the workplace.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.