A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Church hospitals might be required to provide ERISA benefits

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

The separation of church and state is a strong sentiment for many people in the United States. Although most people believe that separation of church and state is important, the issue becomes quite confusing when dealing with the particulars of individual cases.

One area in which this issue becomes especially confusing involves church-affiliated hospitals and the degree to which the government should regulate these facilities and their policies, especially when the actual establishment and oversight of a church over these facilities is a grey area.

According to an article in Society for Human Resource Management, the Supreme Court will hear a case involving whether church-affiliated hospitals should be required to provide hospital employees retirement benefits required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

About ERISA

One of the main purposes of ERISA is to require employers to provide retirement benefits to employees. However, ERISA provides an exemption for religious organizations.

Should Church-Affiliated Hospitals Be Bound by ERISA?

Whether the ERISA provisions should apply to church-affiliated hospitals is a complicated question revolving around whether hospitals fall under ERISA’s exemption.

To fall under the exemption, an employer needs to be “established and maintained” by a church. However, the article states that “an amendment to ERISA added that exempt plans may be ‘maintained’ by organizations that are controlled by a church, but the amendment doesn’t say that church plans can be ‘established’ by an affiliated organization.”

So the main issue is whether the amendment covers hospitals that are maintained by a church but not established by a church. It is a fine distinction, but one that could have serious consequences for a large percentage of America’s hospitals.

What This Means For Hospitals and Employees

Although there are compelling arguments on both side of this issue, anyone can agree that the outcome of this case will have a significant impact for church-affiliated hospitals and their employees.

If the Supreme Court does determine that ERISA’s retirement provision requirements do apply to church-affiliated hospitals, it be a huge benefit for employees of these organizations. On the other hand, the costs of providing these benefits could put some hospitals out of business.

We will certainly keep our eyes out on the development of this case, as it is likely to impact many hospital workers.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.