The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently made some clarifications regarding the CAN-SPAM Act. The clarifications include:
The term “sender” in regards to multi-advertiser e-mails.
The modification of the term “sender” addresses the situation in which there are more than one advertiser in a single commercial e-mail. According to the clarification, one of the advertisers can assume the role of “sender” as defined by the Act. This one advertiser would then have the responsibility of honoring opt out requests, etc., and only the opt-out mechanism and “physical postal address” of the designated sender would have to be included in the e-mail in order to comply with the Act. If the designated sender fails to comply with the CAN-SPAM Act, the other advertisers can be held accountable. Previously, the Act, required that each advertiser in a commercial e-mail was responsible for complying with the Act’s requirements.
In order for one advertiser to become the designated sender with respect to the Act, the advertiser must meet 3 requirements:
A. the person must be a “sender” as defined by the Act, this person must induce the e-mail to be sent and have their product, service, or web site advertised or promoted in the e-mail.
B. the person must be identified as the sole sender in the “from” line of the e-mail message.
C. the person must be in compliance with the following five sections of the Act:
the header information must not be materially false or misleading and it must accurately identify the sending computer (15 U.S.C. 7704(a)(1));
the subject heading cannot mislead a reasonable recipient as to a material fact about the contents of the e-mail (15 U.S.C. 7704(a)(2));
the e-mail must include a valid opt-out mechanism (15 U.S.C. 7704(a)(3)(A)(i));
the e-mail must include a clear commercial identifier, opt-out notice, and physical address (15 U.S.C. 7704(a)(5)(A)); and
a sexually oriented e-mail must have the appropriate disclaimer and be formatted correctly (16 CFR 316.4).
For example, an airline sending out a commercial e-mail that includes advertisements from the them, a car rental company, and a hotel chain. In this case, each of these three entities would be advertisers in the e-mail, but if they collectively designate the airline to be the “sender” of the e-mail under the Act, and if the airline meets the three requirements above, then only the airline would be considered the sender.
Tell-A-Friend Email Marketing Campaigns
The Act makes advertisers somewhat accountable for CAN-SPAM compliance regarding e-mails that are sent to a someone’s friend in connection with a tell-a-friend campaign.
E-mails cannot be sent to a friend who has opted out of receiving commercial e-mails from that company
E-mails that are sent to the friend would have to include the company’s physical postal address and opt-out mechanism, accurate routing information, a subject line that is not misleading, and, in some cases, be identified as an ad.
If a company offers to “pay or provide a gift” to a person in exchange for sending the commercial e-mail to his or her friends, the company will be responsible for the e-mail’s compliance with the Act. However, if a person forwards a message to a friend, without receiving anything of value in exchange, the company will not be responsible for the CAN-SPAM compliance of the e-mails that are sent.
Opt-Out Requests
E-mail recipients should be able to opt-out by either one of the following:
Replying to a specified e-mail address
Visiting a single web page and selecting their opt-out preferences.
Recipients must NOT be required to pay a fee or provide any other information besides their e-mail address and opt-out preferences. The recipient can be asked to indicate which kind of e-mails, if any, they would like to receive, but can not be required to log into their account or to submit their name, address, or any form of payment in order to opt-out.
Definition of Person
The FTC added a definition of “person” to clarify that the CAN-SPAM Act applies to more than just natural persons. As defined by the rule, person includes:
individuals
groups
unincorporated associations
limited or general partnerships
corporations
Valid Physical Postal Address
According to the FTC’s clarification, of “valid physical postal address,” the sender may use their current street address, a Post Office box the sender has accurately registered with the United States Postal Service, or a private mailbox the sender has accurately registered with a commercial mail-receiving agency that is established pursuant to United States Postal Services regulations.
If you are receiving unsolicited spam via text messages, email, faxes or calls to your cell phone, you may be entitled to compensation. Please give California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman a call at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.
Quick Navigation
Free Consultation
"*" indicates required fields
Undisclosed
Settlement
TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.
TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.
Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.
TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.
TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.
Class-wide settlement in wage and hour independent contractor misclassification class action on behalf of approximately 1,800 valet employees. Final approval granted.
Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.
$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.
One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.
Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.
Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.
With so many law firms in Southern California and throughout the United States, why choose the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman?
Todd Friedman has been named a 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026 Super Lawyer, a distinction of professional achievement and peer recognition.
Speak directly with attorney Todd Friedman about your case. Todd will evaluate your situation and provide prompt and straightforward feedback, saving you time and alleviating uncertainty.
Our firm has earned an A+ Rating from the Better Business Bureau, and has been accredited since 2010.
We are strong advocates for our clients and have the resources necessary to take on powerful opponents and win.
Contact Us
and start fighting back
We offer Free Initial Consultations.
If you have experienced a violation of your rights, call us at 323-690-1688 or fill out the form to the right →
Not ready to commit yet? Check out our Testimonials page and see what others have said about their experience working with us!
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site, including collecting and providing that information to third party vendors to improve our experience, and for marketing purposes. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.