A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Class Status Obtained in Collections Lawsuit

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

For those who suffer abuse and privacy violations from debt collectors, a recent case should give a sense of hope and justice.

In this case, which is currently in progress in Washington courts, the plaintiffs have recently been granted their petition for class status. This is a truly encouraging development that will allow the case to move forward as a class action lawsuit.

The case, Rodriguez v. Experian, is a suit against a collections agency, Alliance One, for impermissibly obtaining credit reports on debtors in violation of the Fair Credit Report Act (“FCRA”). Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that Alliance One had a policy of obtaining credit reports for consumers on whom they were collecting parking ticket judgments. Plaintiff alleges that type of debt (arising from parking ticket judgments) does not allow for an unauthorized credit pull to be done by debt collectors, and that obtaining credit information on Plaintiff and other class members for this purpose is an “impermissible” purpose, which violates the FCRA, and violates Plaintiff and the class members’ right to privacy. Plaintiff alleges that the conduct of Alliance One was willful, and that they knowingly violated this law, to the detriment of consumers. In short, Plaintiff’s suit seeks damages for Plaintiff and class members on the basis that Alliance One knowingly and willfully obtained credit information from Experian in a way that violated the law and the consumer debtors’ privacy.

The lawsuit will commence as a class action suit, consolidating everyone’s claim into one unified claim, which gives the claim better chances of success in the courtroom.

At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, we are proud that our own Meghan George was lead on this result.

We will keep you updated as to the progress of this case as we fight for the protection of debtors throughout the country.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.