A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Dangers of Dispute Resolution Clauses in Employment Contracts

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

They’re often called “boiler-plate” clauses, and most employment contracts are filled with them: those little subsections in a contract that are pre-written and appear very official, stipulating all sorts of small details about the agreement. These clauses cover everything from vacation and paid time off to various benefits and diversity policies.

One of the most common, and potentially most dangerous, clauses in an employment contract is the dispute resolution clause. If you are entering into a new employment contact, it is important to understand dispute resolution clauses and to understand your rights.

What is a Dispute Resolution Clause?

As the name suggests, a dispute resolution clause is a clause within a contract that stipulates the procedures and instruments for resolving any disputes that arise among the parties in the course of fulfilling a contract. These clauses exist in almost any kind of contract.

What Are the Problems with Dispute Resolution Clauses?

In the vast majority of employment contracts, there is no problem with a dispute resolution clause. Because no disputes arise in the course of the contract, the dispute resolution stipulations never have any impact.

However, it is the times when disputes arise that these contracts matter. The problem with dispute resolution contracts is that they usually stipulate that disputes will be resolved outside of traditional litigation.

Again, most of the time, this is fine, but in some cases, the employee is much better served being able to take the case to court.

What Are Your Rights?

It is important to recognize your rights both on the front end, before signing the contract and afterwards, when a dispute arises.

On the front end, it is important to remember that a contract does not come into effect until you sign it. All those official looking clauses are not set in stone. You have every right to look over the fine print and negotiate any of the clauses a contract contains.

Realistically, sitting with a prospective employer and negotiating the dispute resolution clause in your contract is something you should only do if you are signing onto a very high-paying, prestigious job, and only if you really think there could be problems down the road.

Once you are in a contract and a dispute arises, it is important to remember that the terms of a dispute resolution contract can often be beaten. Certain situations and creative legal work can nullify or override the agreement to resolve issues outside of the court.

The most important thing you can do – whether you are entering into a new employment contract or facing a dispute with your employer – is to work with a skilled, experienced attorney to make sure you are protecting your rights and your future.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.