A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Debt collector caught suing the wrong person

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
New Jersey based debt collection agency, Pressler & Pressler is accused of suing the wrong person, even though that person had told them that he was not the man they were looking for.   According to Marke Hoyte, he was sued by Pressler & Pressler even though his social security number and date of birth did not match the Marke Hoyte’s information  in Pressler & Pressler’s file.  It was not until Pressler & Pressler’s attorney spoke with Hoyte in the court’s hallway that they finally admitted that they had sued the wrong person and agree to dismiss the case. After hearing the details leading to the dismissal request, Judge Noach Dear asked Pressler & Pressler’s attorney why his law firm did not make sure it had the right person before suing. The attorney responded by saying said that Pressler & Pressler used a free online “white pages” database called “AnyWho” to look for debtors. Judge Dear replied, “So you just shoot in the dark against names, if there are 16 Mark Hoytes, you go after without exactly knowing who, what, when and where?” Judge Dear asked. But instead of conceding their mistake, Pressler & Pressler’s attorney attempted to blame Hoyte. The attorney asked Hoyte if he had ever provided Pressler & Pressler with any written proof that he was not the correct debtor. Hoyte responded by saying that Pressler & Pressler asked for written proof. Incredibly, Pressler’s attorney then said to Hoyte, “So, without any written proof that it is not you, you would expect someone just, you know, to go on say-so?”  Evidently, the fact that the social security number and birthdate that they had in their records did not match his, was not enough written proof…  Judge Dear is considering sanctions against Pressler & Pressler for its easily avoided mistake. You are being harassed by debt collectors about debts that are not yours, in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practiced Act (FDCPA)  then you may be entitled to compensation.    Please call California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.