A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Debt Collector Uses Social Media to Harass Debtor

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Social media websites are a great tool for entertainment and to keep in touch with family and friends, but always be on alert when you are using them. Increasingly, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn are becoming a tools of harassment by debt collectors. Social media information has also been used in other legal proceedings, such as divorce, personal injury and criminal cases.

Recently, a Florida woman sued a debt collector alleging they used information collected from her social media profiles in order to manipulate her into paying the debt. The debt collector had located her on social media websites and was familiar with her personal life, including her children and her vacation habits. The debt collector then called a third-party in an attempt to collect the debt. The debt collector called the woman’s boyfriend, asking him if he knew her and told him that she owed over $8,000.  The collector also called the woman’s mother, advising her about the debt and threatening to sue the woman. Following those phone calls, the collector called the plaintiff again and threatened to take money out of her account and to attempt to take her business license.

The debt collector’s actions are a violation of federal law. Debt collectors aren’t allowed to threaten, harass, or intimidate. They can’t let anyone else know of the existence of the debt, other than the creditor. They are allowed to call a third-party, but only for the purpose of obtaining contact information for the creditor.  They are no allowed to disclose your debt amount.

If you have been harassed by a debt collector, in violation of the FDCPA, you may be entitled to compensation.  Please give my office a call today, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman at (877) 449-8898.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.