A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Deleting Spam and Telemarketers From Your Life

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
Telemarketers, spam emails and spam texts have become heavily engrained into our everyday lives.  So much so, that most of us do not even realize how much time we spend deleting the spam that fills our lives.  Whether it’s the latest political candidate asking for money, credit card offers, people wanting to sell you magazines,  the constant barrage can wear away at your peace of mind. While it’s very difficult to rid yourself of unwanted spam entirely, there are things you can do to greatly reduce it. The government has passed some laws that make it easier, and now there are websites that allow you to opt out of much of the junk mail that comes to you through the postal service. Here’s how to take back your inbox: Below are some suggestions that can help you lighten the spam load… The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 was designed to better regulate email spam and set rules for businesses that contact their customers electronically. The Act includes any email with a primarily commercial message and essentially dictates several rules that must be followed when sending commercial emails. The rule of particular importance for reducing spam is the one that says commercial emails must include an opt-out link that removes you from the mailing list in a timely manner. If businesses don’t comply, the punishment is stiff—up to $16,000 in fines per email Making use of your email spam filters, it takes a few minutes to set up your filters, but it will save you time in the long run. In addition, you can use a program such as Spam Assassin, which provides another layer of filtering. These recognize spam through things like known spam domains, certain header characteristics, and content. Many mail clients will also use an algorithm to “learn” what is junk and what isn’t depending on how you tag it. You can add  yourself to the National Do Not Mail List; it won’t get rid of everything, but allows you to opt out of a lot of direct mail. Another, similar site called the Mail Preference Service allows you to opt out of mail sent by the major marketing associations in the U.S. If you receive a lot of unwanted catalogs, you can call and ask to be removed from their mailing lists, as well. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), states that solicitors must remove you from their call lists if you ask them to during a solicitation call. In addition, they are prohibited from calling you if you register your number with the Do-Not-Call list .  Companies that are found to be in violation of the TCPA must pay you compensation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.