A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Employers behaving badly: Discrimination in the workplace

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
Whether you are a long-time employee seeking a promotion or a potential employee at your initial interview, employers are strictly prohibited from discriminating on the basis of:
  • Age
  • Disability
  • Religion
  • Gender
  • Race or national origin
  • Pregnancy
Many acts of discrimination are hidden behind closed doors, disguised as “innocent” remarks or buried in a long list of application questions. Some, however, are more easily identified. The recent result of a discrimination lawsuit is a good example of an employer behaving badly and not even trying to hide it. A woman endured a rigorous interviewing process and received the long sought-after offer of employment. All went well up to this point. However, upon accepting the offer in a phone call to the HR department, she asked about the company’s maternity benefits, as she was pregnant. Within 30 minutes of her call, the company rescinded the job offer. Apparently, this employer did not know it is illegal to discriminate against women who are pregnant. The woman was eventually awarded $100,000 in a settlement Questions employers cannot ask during interviews While most acts of discrimination are not as easy to spot as in this example, look out for questions designed to get the information from you in another way.
  • Race: A comment about your accent can lead to a question about where you are from.
  • Age: A remark about attending the same high school or college can turn into a question about when you graduated.
  • Religion: Questions about your church involvement, affiliation or religious practices — such as required clothing or prayer time — are forbidden unless the hiring company is a religious organization.
  • Children: If you notice a photo of the interviewer’s children and make casual conversation about them, the interviewer cannot ask you about yours or about pregnancy.
  • National origin: A job that requires mastery of multiple languages may lead to questions about which language you speak at home. This is inappropriate.
  • Disability: Even if you are in a wheelchair, questions about disabilities or special accommodations should not come up, although questions about your ability to do the job may.
What to do if you are asked an inappropriate question Trust your gut. If a question doesn’t feel right to you, ask what the answer has to do with your job qualifications. Seek clarification, and think about your answer before responding. While the interviewer may not know the law, that is no excuse for asking inappropriate questions. Anti-discrimination laws were created to protect you. If you suspect that you were not hired or promoted because of discrimination, ask an employment law attorney for advice.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.