A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Employment discrimination may be facilitated by social media

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

In California and throughout the country, there is a new problem with the glut of personal information that people post online about themselves. It has been revealed that online research by employers is a powerful tool for employment discrimination. Instead of having to ask obviously improper questions during the job interview, for example, the interviewer can now surreptitiously turn to Facebook or another service to get some of the person’s traits, such as age, religion, sexual preference, race and ethnic affiliation.

The prospect can be turned down for the job for prepared reasons that are intended to mask the true reason for the decision, which may be that the person is a Muslim or that she is of a certain ethnic background. Some social media pages of prospective employees will, of course, reveal more information than others. That in itself is a reason to keep one’s details private.

A recent university study revealed that businesses are more and more tending to look up the job prospect’s profile online. The problem with this is that employment discrimination can be so easily hidden after the key prejudicial information has been inculcated into the interviewer’s memory prior to the interview taking place. One traditional way of catching discrimination has been through reconstructing the job interview and looking at the questions asked.

A California employer can more easily engage in employment discrimination with the assistance of the social media explosion. New ways of stopping such tactics are necessary in the digital environment that has unintentionally facilitated these more complex and devious methods of discrimination. Some critics have proposed more controls on social media rules regarding reporting such details to the public. Some say that employers should make interviews anonymous and cut out the temptation of looking the prospect up online. The government could also conduct various kinds of undercover investigations to catch violators, according to some experts.

Source: Los Angeles Times, “Applying for a job? Better delete your social media accounts.“, Steven Strauss, Jan. 7, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.