A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Fight Back Against Telemarketer Robo-Calls

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

We have all experienced the frustration: The phone rings. The number on the caller ID doesn’t look familiar, but you answer anyway, and after the short pause the pre-recorded, automated voice begins trying to sell you something you neither want or need.

You have been robo-called. This is an extremely frustrating experience for the one answering the call, and in many cases, it is illegal.

What Are Robo-Calls?

Robo-calls are the automated calls that companies send to people. They are sales calls, but instead of talking to a real-life salesperson, you have to listen to a pre-recorded voice trying to sell you something. In some cases the message is a simple sales message, other times the message tries to glean personal information from you or scare you into action through dubious or false information.

All of these calls are problematic, and many of them are illegal.

Many Robo-Calls Are Illegal

There are federal laws and California laws regulated automated telemarketing calls. Really, any solicitation to residences using an artificial voice or to cell phones using artificial or pre-recorded voice are illegal under federal law. Further, federal law mandates that companies using pre-recorded sales calls need to maintain and honor a “do-not-call” list.

In California, an actual human being must come on the line to identify the nature of the call, and the person answering must consent to the recording being played.

Under these rules, it seems that almost all instances of robo-calls are illegal.

You Dont Need to Take it Lying Down

Most people just accept robo-calls as part of life. They feel like there is no recourse they can take to make these calls stop.

But you do have rights. If you have been harassed by repeated robo-calls, you should talk with an attorney right away. Attorney Todd M. Friedman in California has a wealth of experience handling consumer rights issues, including robo-calls and other forms of telemarketer harassment.

In most cases, a company violated the rules around robo-calling do not limit their activity to a small number of people. If you are experiencing robo-calls, chances are good that the same company is violating the rights of many others, too.

By talking to an experienced attorney, you could end up being part of a major class-action claim to obtain compensation for the violations.

If you have been harassed by robo-calls, fight back.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.