A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

For-profit schools may contract against consumer fraud claims

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

There has been a steady body of class action litigation in California and other states against certain types of colleges and private schools that offer up arguably inferior programs and at the same time take in millions or billions in federal financial aid. A few nationwide educational chains may fall into this category. The problem recently for students trying to be compensated for losses incurred through the educational form of consumer fraud is that they find that they have signed agreements restricting them to a form of arbitration as their sole remedy.

Studies recently issued by the Century Foundation and Public Citizen reveal that for-profit schools often use deceptive enrollment contracts with obscure arbitration clauses inserted in the fine print. The clauses are not negotiated with the students, and the form contracts are on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. Such provisions may be attacked in court as being unconscionable and therefore unenforceable.

The problem with the arbitration remedy in several of these cases is that the arbitration is virtually controlled by the school and the outcomes heavily favor the education institution. This has a disproportionately adverse impact on minority and poor students. The provisions tend to forbid class action remedies by students and even prohibit the filing of a private lawsuit in a state court system. Experienced attorneys may be successful in arguing unconscionability with respect to the pro forma contracts signed by the students.

In California, state authorities filed a lawsuit against Corinthian Colleges and its subsidiaries for false advertising, securities fraud and intentional misrepresentation. Where the contracts are oppressively against any exercise of normal rights by the students, they may sometimes have to rely on state or federal officials to vindicate their claims. In egregious cases, private class action attorneys who are experienced in consumer fraud matters may be able to offer solutions and hope toward obtaining meaningful recoveries for the students.

Source: billmoyers.com, “For-Profit Colleges Have a New Way to Hoodwink Students“, Michelle Chen, May 11, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.