A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Inaccurate background checks can prevent qualified candidates from being hired.

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

When it comes to employment discrimination, there are strict rules on what employers can use as grounds for not hiring a prospective employee. In short, employers are not allowed to refuse hiring for reasons of gender, race, age and other demographic factors spelled out in discrimination laws.

Although employers have these limits on who they can and cannot hire, they generally not required to hire applicants who don’t pass criminal background checks. So in most cases of non-hires based on failed background checks, the applicants don’t bring employment discrimination claims. However, what happens when the background check is wrong?

Not-Hiring Due to Inaccurate Background Check

According to a report in Top Class Actions online, a Colorado man was denied employment at a local Starbucks coffee shop due to a failed background check. The background check apparently returned results consisting of “criminal felony and misdemeanor records from counties in Pennsylvania, some of which involved violent crime and drug-related charges,” according to the article.

The man denied employment claims the background check was false, possibly the result of identity theft. In fact, he claims he has never even been to Pennsylvania.

However, by the time he followed the procedure to dispute the background check results, “Starbucks had already removed him from consideration for employment.”

Legal Options

It is not discrimination for an employer to refuse a hire based on criminal history, the case is not a discrimination claim. The prospective employee is bringing a claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

According to the FCRA, employers need to give every job applicant a meaningful opportunity to dispute background check findings. In this case, the plaintiff is claiming that Starbucks made its decision before he could follow the dispute procedure and get an accurate, updated background report.

Protect Your Rights

If you have been denied employment due to a failed background check, you might not think you have a claim because it doesn’t look like discrimination. However, there are numerous claims that many prospective employers might not consider. It is critical to talk directly with an experienced employment lawyer who can identify potential claims and protect your interests.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.