A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Lawsuits claim consumer fraud against several donut franchises

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Several class action claims against a giant food retailer were recently filed in federal district courts. The lawsuits are in the nature of consumer fraud claims alleging that national franchiser Dunkin’ Donuts illegally taxed consumers on the purchase of coffee bean bags that were purchased to take home. State tax laws allegedly provide that such purchases cannot be taxed. It is unknown whether California stores would be involved in future claims, but the claims filed so far involve about a dozen different stores in other states.

Although coffee bean purchases appear to be a minor amount of change in terms of the tax charged, the lawsuits are claiming that, in the course of three years, the stores made around $14 million in excess funds that should have remained in consumers’ pockets. The Dunking Donuts corporate office stated that its franchise operators are expected to follow all state and federal tax laws and regulations. The complaints sue the main corporate entity, Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. and a number of retail stores.

The complaints accuse the stores of knowingly duping consumers for the extra money despite customers’ complaints. The suits allege that the stores overcharged customers about 70 percent of the time, which indicates an unknown variation in these taxing policies. The allegations also indicate that the stores intentionally pocketed the money instead of sending the funds in to state agencies for tax payments.

Because the particular sales carried no tax obligation, the stores would not have submitted taxes that were not assessed. That fact makes it apparent that the plaintiffs, who are all store customers, are alleging not just negligence but a pattern of consumer fraud carried out by the stores against their customers. It is unknown if California exempts coffee bean take-home sales from a sales tax, but if so, the state can expect to see a flurry of class actions on that issue or similar ones sometime soon.

Source: eater.com, “Dunkin’ Donuts Allegedly Overcharged Thousands of Customers in NY and NJ “, Whitney Filloon, Feb. 9, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.