A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

McDonald’s facing class action sexual harassment lawsuit

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok
You expect your company to protect you from sexual harassment in the workplace. But when managers of local stores don’t enforce harassment policies, your co-workers may feel they can get away with inappropriate behavior. A McDonald’s employee in Michigan recently experienced this when her general manager did not respond to her reports of sexual harassment. McDonald’s and one of its Michigan franchises may now face a class-action lawsuit.

Employee suffered a year of ignored harassment

The employee filed the lawsuit after a co-worker allegedly harassed her for over a year. She said her general manager ignored the behavior. The employee felt that if she spoke up, she could lose her job. Eventually, her manager transferred her, but her co-worker kept his job. Now the employee has filed a class-action lawsuit and reported the behavior to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). She joins 50 other McDonald’s workers across the country who reported sexual harassment to the EEOC over the past three years. The employee hopes her lawsuit will make sexual harassment training mandatory in McDonald’s stores.

McDonald’s sexual harassment training not mandatory in franchises

While McDonald’s offers sexual harassment training, 95% of the stores are franchises. The company does not require franchise owners to offer training to employees.

You expect a strict policy against sexual harassment

Regardless of where you work, you expect your company to have and enforce a standard sexual harassment policy. When your managers and co-workers don’t receive training, they may feel they can get away with inappropriate behavior.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.