A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

New California Laws to Protect Employees

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Although there are always individual situation that remain problematic, in general, these are exciting times for California employees. The laws and the courts are becoming increasingly favorable for employees in regards to fair pay, discrimination, appropriate work leave and other important issues.

California is on the cutting edge of the entire nation in terms of employment law and protecting the rights of employees in the workplace.

Recent California Laws Protecting Potential Employee Privacy

Recently, National Law Review online explains a number of new statutes enacted to protect employee rights throughout the state.

Two new statutes of particular interest involve what information an employer can legally request from a job applicant.

First, the “ban the box” legislation protects applicants from being forced to disclose past criminal conviction history. Technically, the law is an amendment to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). The law applies to employers of more than five employees, and it prohibits them from asking any question intended to disclose an applicant’s conviction history until the applicant has received a conditional offer.

Second, California has placed new restrictions on employers obtaining a prospective worker’s past salary history. Specifically, this new law prohibits all private and public sector employers from:

  • “relying on salary history as a factor in determining whether to offer employment to an applicant or what salary to offer; or
  • seeking, orally or in writing or through an agent, salary history information about an applicant.”

The obvious benefit of this new restriction is that employees won’t risk being paid less by an employer simply because their previous jobs did not pay them enough. This allows for greater freedom to negotiate better salaries for potential employees.

Both of these laws provide the workers of California tremendous freedom and benefits – and genuine empowerment – in the workplace.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.