A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

New law protects consumers from hidden automatic renewals

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

It’s one of the easiest ways to accidentally spend money – start a free trial of a service, then forget to cancel until you find a strange charge on your credit card when the trial period ends. Then when you try to cancel you discover the subscription can only be cancelled over the phone, even though everything else is online. 

Hidden charges and complicated cancellation processes have frustrated consumers for years, but in 2018 the California legislature fought back. Consumers now have even greater protection from confusing business practices by online subscriptions.

 

No more sneaky automatic renewals

Existing law made it unlawful for businesses offering services with an automatic renewal to fail to make the renewal terms clear and conspicuous to consumers. The new law, passed in July, expands this rule to services that include an initial free gift or a free trial. Under California Senate Bill 313, price increases and other changes that occur at the end of a free trial must be clearly presented prior to a customer signing up. In a recent case, the parent company of several online dating sites including Christian Mingle was sued for automatically renewing subscriptions without the express consent of their customers.

Start online and cancel online

This new consumer protection law also addresses another annoyance: online subscriptions that can only be cancelled by phone. In the past, customers were often forced to call and speak to a sales representative to end a subscription, even if they signed up online.

In many cases, these phone calls would include a long survey or extensive conversations where company employees would try to convince the customer to keep their subscription. In some cases, the person receiving the cancellation call would simply hang up. Now, subscriptions that begin online must provide the option of cancelling online.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the senator who wrote the bill stated that consumers need to know what they are signing up for when it comes to online services.

As more and more services operate entirely online, consumer protection laws will have to keep up. Based on these developing regulations, the California legislature seems to be serious about ensuring online businesses are transparent with their customers.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.