A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Payday Loan Scams

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

In recent years, reports of consumers receiving harassing calls by scam artists pretending to be payday loan debt collectors attempting to collect on supposedly delinquent payday loans has been on the rise.  These scam artists use various coercion techniques, including abusive language, threats of bodily harm or arrest in an attempt  to bully victims in to sending them money.  Unfortunately, many consumers have been frightened into submission and send money that they do not owe to these fake debt collectors.  According to the most recent report from the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), scammers have been using a tactic known as spoofing, or placing a call that appears to be coming from a different number than the one that they are calling from.  According to the  IC3 these criminals have been spoofing police departments’ phone numbers when calling to convince victims of their impending arrest. The scam artist claims there is a warrant issued for the victim’s arrest for failure to pay off a loan. And to get law enforcement to actually show up at the victim’s home, scammers will place several, harassing phone calls to the police department while spoofing the victim’s phone number.

While these elaborate scams are difficult to prosecute, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, (FDCPA) and California’s Rosenthal Act offer consumers protection against harassment from legitimate debt collectors and telemarketers.  If you have been harassed by a legitimate debt collector, you may be entitled to compensation.  Please give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call today at (877) 449-8898 for a free case evaluation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.