A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Racism in the workplace

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

How does one deal with racial discrimination in the workplace? What kind of protection could a victim of a racial slur defend himself or herself? What regulations should every employer follow to limit racial discrimination in the workplace? These questions are very important to ask and complex to understand. It is important for employees to know what to do when facing this kind of prejudicial behavior when working.

Regulations

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission forbids racial/color discrimination in the workplace. This typically involves treating an employee or even an applicant who plans on working under the employer, in a prejudicial manner given that he or she is of a specific race. This can come down to pointing out the victim’s skin color, facial features, hair texture, accent, country of origin, heritage, customs, traditions, language, etc.

In several occasions, the victim can be a person who happens to be in a relationship with a person of color or from a certain race. For example, someone married to a person from a different race can also receive discrimination in the workplace simply because of their spouse.

The law clearly forbids any kind racial discrimination when it comes to considering a candidate for a certain position in the workplace. A person’s wages, his or her position in the workplace, their assignments, promotions, benefits, training, and several other nuances of the job should not be limited or conditioned based on the person’s race.

What to do?

The underlying problem when dealing with racism in the workplace is that it usually goes undetected and many employees behave in a prejudicial manner without knowing it. It is important to be aware of the subtleties behind someone’s behavior and not let it go undetected if there are some suspicions on the person’s actions. If an employee fears that he or she has suffered racial discrimination, then it is important for the victim to speak up their supervisor, human resources, or even an employment attorney.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.