A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Roscoe’s Chicken ‘n Waffles loses $1M racial discrimination suit

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Anyone can potentially become the victim of workplace discrimination based on race, no matter their ethnic background. And no ethnicity excuses a business owner, executive or manager from discriminatory behavior toward subordinates.

In a local example, a former employee of Southern California chain Roscoe’s Chicken ‘n Waffles has prevailed in his discrimination suit against the company, and has been awarded more than $1 million in damages. The plaintiff, who is black, says that Latino managers at the location he worked at mistreated him because of his race.

Among his allegations: that management harassed him for being black, and that Latino co-workers enjoyed preferential treatment. For instance, they routinely received better work schedules that the plaintiff.

Though the plaintiff brought the matter to the attention of Roscoe’s human resources department, and ultimately to the business’ owner, nothing changed and he was later fired. The owner is also black, “but he gives full authority to the Hispanics to run it,” the plaintiff said.

After losing his job, the plaintiff became homeless. Now, a jury has compensated him for his ordeal. Though an article by KCBS-TV does not mention it, the size of the award suggests that it is partially made up of punitive damages. This form of damages is meant to punish defendants for especially egregious behavior. The plaintiff and his attorney hope the verdict will send Roscoe’s the message to follow the law.

It seems that most cases of racial workplace discrimination involve white managers and business owners. But all California businesses are required to treat their employees fairly, no matter their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation and so on.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.