A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Sexual harassment of housekeepers brings $1 million settlement

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Some employers have not learned that they must take sexual harassment claims by employees seriously. In California and all other states, an employer must immediately see to it that there is no possibility of the charges being repeated, even if that means transferring the accused supervisor to another department or location. The employing company must also must quickly make a thorough and objective investigation to determine whether sexual harassment did occur.

The employer is also prohibited from taking retaliatory action against a person who makes a sexual harassment claim. These are all part of the protocol required by both state and federal laws that prohibit employment discrimination of this kind. A case in a nearby state shows all of the wrong ways for a company to handle sexual harassment charges.

The Vail Run Resort and its management company have agreed to pay $1million to be distributed among eight female housekeepers. They claimed that a housekeeping supervisor demanded sex from them or he would fire them, give them less hours and otherwise harass them on the job. He assaulted the women sexually several times. When the women got up the courage to complain to the management company, Global Hospitality Resorts, an executive at the company told them they could quit if they didn’t like it, and did nothing to prevent additional abuse from occurring.

The mistreatment in the case is considered to be a common peril for immigrants who work in the hospitality industry. The company agreed to hire a bilingual monitor to see to it that the settlement terms were enforced. In addition, the company promised to train managers in the employment laws prohibiting discrimination and sexual harassment. The main offender who committed the sexual assaults is now facing criminal charges. The prohibited actions that occurred are illegal in California as well as all other states.

Source: foxnews.com, “Manager at top ski resort in CO demanded sexual favors from Mexican workers, suit says”, Feb. 17, 2016

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.