A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Stopping Foreclosure By Filing Bankruptcy

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Losing your home can be a very traumatic experience and often times a homeowner ends up in the predicament through no fault of their own.  In this tough economy many hardworking people have found themselves either under-employed or unemployed for years.  They try to take whatever jobs they can just to get by, but often times these jobs are not enough to sustain a household.  Medical issues are another problem that cause financial hardships with families.  The combination of these problems can cause havoc even on financially responsible people and when there is no way out Bankruptcy can be a lifesaver.

one of the most powerful protections in  bankruptcy is the automatic stay.  The bankruptcy automatic stay prevents nearly all creditor and/or collection activity against the person who filed bankruptcy.  This includes providing protection from having real property sold at a foreclosure auction. Thus, if your house is scheduled to be sold at an auction, filing bankruptcy will stop the auction.  This will allow the homeowner some time to regroup and perhaps save their home.

However, it is important to have a plan on how to keep the property during and after the bankruptcy.  Bankruptcy should not be filed only to delay a foreclosure sale date.

If you are a Southern California homeowner who is being threatened with foreclosure on your home please call my office at (877) 449-8898.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.