A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Taking a look at forced retirement and possible discrimination

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Todd M Friedman age discrimination retirementCommercial pilots, FBI members and air traffic controllers face mandatory retirement ages. This was not true for the medical field. Physicians had the ability to retire when they chose to do so in California. Today, Late Career Practitioner Policies are being instituted by hospitals and medical staffs. While those policies do not impose mandatory retirement ages, they do institute processes used to detect if the physician is beginning to wane in physical, psychological and cognitive abilities. These policies are coming into question and may violate several anti-discriminatory acts and statutes.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is responsible for enforcing federal laws that prevent discrimination in hiring practices. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act prevents employers from discriminating against an individual based on age in terms of pay and privileges of employment. Employees cannot be segregated by age either. The Americans with Disabilities Act prevents employers from examining a potential employee in order to find out if a disability is true when the exam leads to evidence that is not relevant to the job and its tasks.

Instead of basing the new policies in the medical fields on age, there are groups who are suggesting alternatives. Code of conduct and behavior policies are an example. Physician wellness committees can be formed as well as taking non-disciplinary remedial measures. Physicians can be evaluated, but the suggestion is to do so on a neutral basis.

Physicians who believe that they are being discriminated against because of their age can bring their case to court. Discrimination is not accepted for physicians. It is not accepted for any other individual in the workplace either. A good way to approach the situation is to seek advice from a lawyer who has experience dealing with these kinds of cases. A legal professional may be able to map out the best road to take.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.