A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

The problems with payday loans

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

With the challenging state of our economy in the United States, it makes sense that many people fall into financial challenges from time to time. For some, it seems like the only way to cover costs between paychecks is a payday loan.

However, these payday loans should be avoided unless there is no other choice. In addition to unethical lending practices, these payday loan companies commit a range of fair debt collections violations.

What Is a Payday Loan?

A payday loan is a small cash loan. Borrows take out these loans generally to cover their costs before their next paycheck comes in. They are attractive loans for people to get to their next paychecks, as not much is needed to obtain these loans.

What is the Problem with PayDay Loans?

There are two primary problems with these loans.

First, the interest rates attached to these loans is unconscionable. Borrowers who miss a single payment are faced with impossibly high compounding interest rates. Before long, most borrowers go from small cashflow problems to financial dire straits. Payday loans do more damage than good in the majority of cases.

Second, once borrowers fall behind on their payments, payday loan companies are infamous for engaging in a range of collections law violations, including:

  • Excessive collection calls, including calls after legal hours
  • Collection calls at work
  • Harassing family members
  • Threats
  • Text messaging harassment

If you can avoid taking out a payday loan, you should. These are extremely dangerous loans that can ruin you financially. If you do find yourself in debt for a payday loan and are falling victim to creditor harassment, you need help fighting for your rights.

At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, we represent clients in a range of consumer rights issues, including creditor harassment from payday loan vendors and other lenders. An experienced team of attorneys is the most potent weapon for protecting your rights against creditor harassment.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.