A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Thomson Reuters Accused of Securities Violations and Wrongful Termination

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Former Thomson Reuters employee, Mark Rosenblum has sued them for wrongful termination after he blew the whistle on what he believed to be a violation of  securities laws.    According to Rosenblum, who worked as a Redistribution Specialist, Thomson Reuters gave selected subscribers a 2-second jump on potentially market-moving information, with a 3-tiered release program.

In his complaint, Rosenblum states that,  the tiered release provides a bimonthly release of information to “ultra low-latency” subscribers at 2 seconds before 9:55 a.m., followed by “desktop” subscribers at 9:55 a.m., followed by release to the public at 10:00 a.m.    Consequently,  the “ultra low-latency” subscribers had a 2 second head start to make transactions based upon information that other subscribers did not have access to yet.

Rosenblum formed the reasonable belief that the Product’s tiered distribution violated securities laws barring insider trading.  Therefore, on June 29, 2012, Rosenblum informed the  FBI that Thomson’s tiered release product violated federal securities laws.   That same day, he also notified his managing director, the president, general counsel and the Thomson employee Ethics Hotline that he had contacted federal investigators regarding the product’s tiered release.

Within weeks, Rosenblum was terminated with no severance and without compensating him for any of his accrued vacation days.

Nationally, Whistle-blowing is protected by  the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), an employee may not be penalized for contacting a government agency about violations of federal provisions concerning securities fraud. Whistleblowers may not be transferred, denied a raise, have their hours reduced, or be fired or punished in any other way because they have exercised any right afforded to them under one of the laws that protect whistleblowers.

Whistleblowing is also protected by California State Law:

1102.5.  (b) An employer may not retaliate against an employee for
disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency,
where the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the
information discloses a violation of state or federal statute, or a
violation or noncompliance with a state or federal rule or
regulation.

Also, in California, When an employee is terminated, the employer must have his or her final paycheck (including all accrued vacation pay) ready on the day of termination.  Failure to do so subjects the employer to “waiting time penalties” for every day the employer fails to give the former employee their paycheck.

If you have been wrongfully terminated or have suffered discrimination, please give California Employment Attorney, Todd M. Friedman a call at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.