A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Welk Resort Sues Telemarketers For Scamming Its Timeshare Owners Out Of Money

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

The Welk Resort Group. located in San Diego has sued VO Financial, its CEO Adam Lacerda, and co-founder Ashley Lacerda in Federal Court, claiming that VO Financial made “repeated and harassing phone calls” to Welk’s timeshare owners to “fleece” them and the resort.
According to the complaint: “VO Financial falsely represents itself as a ‘timeshare research and resolution firm that offers mortgage reduction programs and timeshare rental services.  However, in reality, VO Financial uses a variety of false pretenses to convince timeshare owners to pay them money instead of  making their loan or maintenance fee payments to Welk Resort. VO Financial then pockets the money they take from the timeshare owners, causing the timeshare owners to default on their contractual obligations to Welk.”

“VO telemarketers use a variety of approaches in their sales calls,” the complaint states. “In some calls, VO Financial tries to build upon the goodwill that Welk has spent years developing with its owners by falsely suggesting that VO Financial is associated with Welk.”   For example, VO has misled Welk owners into believing that it was performing a customer service satisfaction survey (so that it could acquire confidential information about Welk owners’ accounts), has falsely claimed to be a collection agency contracted by Welks, has falsely accused Welk of selling its customer information to VO Financial, has falsely accused Welk of illegal lending practices, and has led Welk owners to believe that paying money to VO Financial would eliminate the need for them to pay Welk. All of these ruses share a common goal: to either scare or persuade Welk owners into paying money to VO Financial.”

Make sure that you are 100% certain about who you are speaking with before ever sending anyone money.  Also, if you are being harassed by telemarketers even after telling them to stop, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, (TCPA) you may be entitled to compensation.  Please give my office, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898 for a free consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.