A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

What are my options for dealing with debt collection agents?

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

If you buy something with a credit card it’s fair to expect that a company that has a stake in the bill will want to be paid according to the terms of the contract you signed. It is also fair to expect that some companies might show a certain level of persistence in trying to collect the debt.

However, many in California will appreciate that there can be circumstances under which a normally conscientious person might be unable to meet his or her obligations. That doesn’t mean the person is a laggard. But considering that some creditors choose to use tactics to bully money out of their customers, it can be easy for a person to begin feeling the pressure.

Anyone in that situation should be aware that there are laws on the books at both the state and federal levels that spell out the limits of what debt collectors can and cannot do in their efforts to close the books on past-due accounts. And, as information available through FindLaw explains, there are rights consumers need to know.

For example, the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act makes it illegal for collection agents from trying to reach a debtor at unreasonable hours of the day without the debtor’s permission. The FDCPA sets the timeframe for what’s unreasonable as being before 8 a.m. and after 9 p.m. It should also be noted that this law applies only to third-party collectors, not representatives of a creditor’s own debt collection department.

Other actions outlawed by the FDCPA include:

  • The use of profane language or threats of violence
  • Use misleading or false statements about affiliations, such as claiming to be an attorney
  • Making threats of arrest or wage garnishment, unless state law allows for such

It’s also important for consumers to know that it is possible to halt harassment by engaging the help of an experienced attorney. The FDCPA says that once informed that a debtor has representation, a collection agency must cease all direct contact unless specifically told otherwise.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.